| DOCUMENT |
DESCRIPTION |
COMMENT |
|
|
|
|
Case Status |
Pending case status
|
Contains a general description of the dispute between the parties
|
|
COURT ORDER THE FIGUEROAS ARE BARRED FROM TESTIFYING IN OWN CASE |
Upon a motion from one of the defendants based upon the Figueroas
refusal to attend a deposition, the Court orders that they are barred from
testifying at trial.
|
The effect of this is that the Figueroas will not be allowed to testify
at their own trial. All efforts to take their deposition and find
out the merits, if any, of their case were refused by them and their
counsel.
|
|
COURT ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF'S TO FILE SECURITY |
Court finds that "...there is no reasonable possibility that
Plaintiffs, ESTHER FIGUEROA and JOSE FIGUEROA will prevail in this
action..." against Dr. Hulda Clark. The Court also orders that the
Plaintiffs post $20,000.00 as security if they want to proceed with the
case. The Figueroas fail to post the ordered security.
|
|
|
FIGUEROAS'S ATTORNEYS WITHDRAW FROM CASE |
Attorney Christopher Grell and his law firm file a motion with the
Court to be allowed to withdraw from the case.
|
The motion is taken off calendar when the Figueroas terminate Grell's
representation as their attorney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|